WebTasmania also argued that the Commonwealth had unjustly deprived Tasmania of property through passing the World Heritage Act, contravening section 51(xxxi) of the … WebDec 8, 2024 · December. 16 December 2024. For Judgment: Orreal v The Queen [2024] HCA 44 ()8 December 2024. For Judgment: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Huang [2024] HCA 43 ()Bell v State of Tasmania [2024] HCA 42 ()Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane [2024] HCA 41 ()Arsalan v …
Commonwealth v Tasmania - Cultural Artefact - Saulwick
WebThe government of Tasmania rejected this, arguing that the federal government acted without the necessary constitutional power in making these regulations; that as … WebOct 31, 2024 · Brown v Tasmania [2024] HCA 43 - Crown Law. A majority of the High Court has struck down the key provisions of Tasmanian legislation which regulates protest … tax tables 15 t
SECTION 51(xxix) OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION …
Commonwealth v Tasmania (popularly known as the Tasmanian Dam Case) was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on 1 July 1983. The case was a landmark decision in Australian constitutional law, and was a significant moment in the history of conservation in Australia. The … See more In 1978, the Hydro-Electric Commission, then a body owned by the Tasmanian government, proposed the construction of a hydro-electric dam on the Gordon River, below its confluence with the Franklin River, in … See more The case revolved around several major constitutional issues, the most important being the constitutional validity of the World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 (or World … See more The case ended the HEC's plans to construct more hydro-electric dams in Tasmania. The legal debate … See more • Australian constitutional law • Franklin Dam controversy • 1981 Tasmanian power referendum See more A four to three majority of the seven members of the High Court held that the federal government had legitimately prevented construction of the dam, and that the World … See more The case was later referred to in other cases regarding the definition of Aboriginality (Aboriginal Australian identity). Commonwealth v Tasmania had defined an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander as "a person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent … See more • Commonwealth v Tasmania – Full text of the decision in the High Court of Australia. • Australian Constitution – Full text. See more WebThere is no fundamental inconsistency between a provision of the law of Tasmania that the HEC is vested with authority to do an act which it is prohibited under Tasmanian law from … WebSummary Information: In Commonwealth of Australia v Tasmania (the Tasmanian Dam Case), the High Court of Australia considered whether the Commonwealth Government had the power to stop the Tasmanian Government from damming the Gordon River in South West Tasmania under Commonwealth legislation. the discseel® procedure